Javascript must be enabled to use Listia. Please follow these instructions to enable javascript on your browser.

FREE: BRETT FAVRE ROOKIE CARD

A member of Listia gave this away for free!

Do you want FREE stuff like this?

Listia is 100% Free to use

Over 100,000 items are FREE on Listia

Declutter your home & save money

"Listia is like EBay, except everything is free" - Los Angeles Times

"An Awesome Way To Give And Get Free Stuff" - Michael Arrington, TechCrunch

This Stuff is Free Too:

FREE

Description

The listing, BRETT FAVRE ROOKIE CARD has ended.

1992 Topps Brett Favre Rookie Card #696 Mint Condition.

Check out my 100% flawless Buyer and seller feedback. Bid with confidence.

I buy sell and trade. They call me the Sultan of Swap.

Questions & Comments

And also tradingcarddb.com does not list that card as a rookie card. What does beckett say?

Nov 13th, 2019 at 1:32:53 AM PST by

Jim Beckett, is actually a friend of mine. I have known him personally since 1981, before Beckett Monthly existed. I know that he would consider THE FIRST TOPPS CARD of a ROOKiE player, who had still not yet played a game outside of his rookie season, a rookie card.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 5:13:25 AM PST by

Explosion of 13 comments on the subject. Argument weak, now says he doesn't care. Bwahahaha.

Nov 14th, 2019 at 3:24:00 PM PST by

Don’t care

Nov 14th, 2019 at 10:02:47 AM PST by

It's a rookie. He was still rookie. It can't be anything but a rookie.

Nov 14th, 2019 at 10:04:39 AM PST by

Enough is enough, I Donr care!!!

Nov 14th, 2019 at 10:02:13 AM PST by

You blew up my page with your idiotic, needless and incorrect comments. I only responded.

Nov 14th, 2019 at 10:03:46 AM PST by

And everything on eBay is true?

Nov 14th, 2019 at 9:54:18 AM PST by

Just an illustration that multitudes of people disagree with your definition and interpretation of what a rookie card is. Your description of a rookie card is like Bill Clinton telling us that oral sex isn't sex.

Nov 14th, 2019 at 10:01:26 AM PST by

Goody goody for you

Nov 13th, 2019 at 11:33:25 AM PST by

Search eBay, you will find dozens of examples of this card being described as a rookie card ( for obvious reasons, he was still a rookie ) https://www.ebay.com/itm/BRETT-FAVRE-1992-TOPPS-696-ROOKIE-CARD/293330077675?hash=item444bd5c7eb:g:ypcAAOSwNaBdQh8M

Nov 14th, 2019 at 5:56:19 AM PST by

It’s a piece of lousy cardboard!!!!

Nov 13th, 2019 at 9:47:42 AM PST by

A piece of lousy ROOKIE cardboard.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 11:03:29 AM PST by

Give it up, I really don’t care!!!

Nov 13th, 2019 at 9:47:12 AM PST by

Your blowing up my wall with your false comments. It's not like I am stalking you. I am addressing your complaint.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 11:02:37 AM PST by

Just cause you say so doesn’t make it right

Nov 13th, 2019 at 8:33:01 AM PST by

What do you fail to understand ? He was still a rookie when the card was made.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 8:34:11 AM PST by

By the way, beckett magazine does not list that as a rookie card, fyi

Nov 13th, 2019 at 8:07:38 AM PST by

Still aavaa rookie. Farve was still a rookie. If he had died the day the card was made, he would forever have been ONLY a rookie. I have many times read Jim's discussions on this subject. Yes, it's Jim. I am on a first name basis with Mr Beckett to you.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 8:31:46 AM PST by

Go ask your friend Mr. Beckett, lol

Nov 13th, 2019 at 7:43:36 AM PST by

You doubt that Jim is my friend ? He used to set up a display at my Superstar Celebrity Autograph Baseball card shows. He was right next to Mike Cramer of Cramer Sports Promotions, now known as Pacific Trading Cards.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 11:30:16 AM PST by

If a player was still a rookie when his card was produced, it is a rookie card. That's not even debatable.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 7:38:04 AM PST by

Just my opinion that’s all, no need for justification.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 7:30:19 AM PST by

To share an opinion with no justification supporting that opinion. Brilliant !

Nov 13th, 2019 at 7:40:13 AM PST by

It's not his rookie card

Nov 12th, 2019 at 5:48:11 PM PST by

It is indeed one of his rookie cards. He was still rookie status, had not yet played a game in his sophomore season. It's a first regular issue Topps card. There are hundreds of examples I can site throughout the hobby of other " rookie cards " like this. It's just semantics to argue this isn't a rookie, when he was still rookie status at the time of its release.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 5:57:39 PM PST by

It’s his first regular topps card, so according to that they may consider it his rookie card for that brand,but I don’t consider it his rookie card as he has already played for falcons.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 1:30:48 AM PST by

He was still rookie status, as he had not yet played a game that was not his rookie season. If he was still a rookie, this has to be a rookie card. I didn't say it was his most valuable card, I said it's a rookie card, which it is.

Nov 13th, 2019 at 5:09:43 AM PST by

Having rated rookie on a card does not make it a rookie card. How can you even say and think that? Again you are confusing a real life rookie with a real rookie card.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:47:54 PM PST by

Bwahahaha, right. Rated Rookie is not a rookie. Good one. I never said this Favre card is his first card, I said it's a rookie card. He was still a rookie when it was made. How can it not be a rookie ?

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:51:23 PM PST by

You are confusing real life rookie status in various leagues with rookie cards. You only have a true rookie year card once. Try and justify it all you want. You only have one rookie year card. Do you consider Mcgwire's first year with the cardinals a rookie card, since it is his first year with the club? With your way of thinking it is. But it's not.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:44:31 PM PST by

I am not confusing anything. I have been doing this since 1969. I know how to define rookie. You're the one who has the problem. Is a 1952 Mickey Mantle not his rookie then ? Is McGwire's Rated Rookie card not a rookie, like it says on the card ?

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:48:40 PM PST by

If McGwire's only rookie is his 1985 Topps card, then you better complain to Donruss about putting RATED ROOKIE on their 1987 card

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:41:47 PM PST by

So according to your logic, a 1952 Mickey Mantle is not his rookie, even though EVERYONE says it is. He has a 1951 Bowman.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:37:13 PM PST by

85 is mcgwire's rookie CARD!!! 86 was his rookie year with the A's. You only have one rookie year, not 2 or 3. Therefore you only have 1 rookie card year. Simple logic. Not hard to understand

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:30:23 PM PST by

Look up the definition for rookie status. You can be a rookie for several years. I have Vladimir Guerrero Jr Rookie cards various years, and he is still a rookie, even now until he plays next year.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:35:10 PM PST by

1977 & 1978 Dale Murphy cards are BOTH rookie cards, and they are made by the same company.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:29:30 PM PST by

1951 Bowman Mickey Mantle is his rookie card. So is his 1952 Topps card.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:28:06 PM PST by

1988 Fleer Edgar Martinez is his rookie card. So are his 1990 Topps, Donruss and Upper Deck cards.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:27:16 PM PST by

1984 Star Company Michael Jordan is a rookie card. So is his 86/87 fleer card

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:24:24 PM PST by

1985 Team USA Mark McGwire is a Rookie card. 1987 Topps is ALSO a rookie card, because he was a rookie when it was made.

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:22:29 PM PST by

He was in regular base sets of 1991 sets. 91 cards are his rookie cards. Pro set platinum, Pacific, upper deck, Topps stadium club,etc. I know the examples you are talking about. But those were in update sets, not regular issue from a previous year. 92 is not his rookie card year

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:07:34 PM PST by

Most definitely a rookie card. He was still a rookie when it was made. If he was a rookie, how can it not be a rookie card? Duh !

Nov 12th, 2019 at 6:20:23 PM PST by

BRETT FAVRE ROOKIE CARD is in the Collectibles | Trading Cards | Sports Trading Cards category